"Cross-Over Studies" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Studies comparing two or more treatments or interventions in which the subjects or patients, upon completion of the course of one treatment, are switched to another. In the case of two treatments, A and B, half the subjects are randomly allocated to receive these in the order A, B and half to receive them in the order B, A. A criticism of this design is that effects of the first treatment may carry over into the period when the second is given. (Last, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed)
Descriptor ID |
D018592
|
MeSH Number(s) |
E05.318.780.150 N05.715.360.780.150 N06.850.520.445.150
|
Concept/Terms |
Cross-Over Studies- Cross-Over Studies
- Cross Over Studies
- Cross-Over Study
- Studies, Cross-Over
- Study, Cross-Over
- Crossover Studies
- Crossover Study
- Studies, Crossover
- Study, Crossover
- Cross-Over Trials
- Cross Over Trials
- Trial, Cross-Over
- Trials, Cross-Over
- Crossover Trials
- Trial, Crossover
- Trials, Crossover
Cross-Over Design- Cross-Over Design
- Cross Over Design
- Cross-Over Designs
- Design, Cross-Over
- Designs, Cross-Over
- Crossover Design
- Crossover Designs
- Design, Crossover
- Designs, Crossover
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Cross-Over Studies".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Cross-Over Studies".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Cross-Over Studies" by people in this website by year, and whether "Cross-Over Studies" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
---|
1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2014 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2022 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2025 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Cross-Over Studies" by people in Profiles.
-
Lerodalcibep and evolocumab for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia with PCSK9 inhibition (LIBerate-HoFH): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, crossover, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025 Mar; 13(3):178-187.
-
Immunogenicity and safety following a homologous booster dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine with Matrix-MTM adjuvant (NVX-CoV2373) versus a primary series in people living with and without HIV-1 infection in South Africa: A randomized crossover phase 2a/2b trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31; 20(1):2425147.
-
Functional performance of the Wondaleaf condom: A crossover, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial. Int J STD AIDS. 2023 02; 34(2):114-121.
-
Could the ketogenic diet induce a shift in thyroid function and support a metabolic advantage in healthy participants? A pilot randomized-controlled-crossover trial. PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0269440.
-
The safety of activated eptacog beta in the management of bleeding episodes and perioperative haemostasis in adult and paediatric haemophilia patients with inhibitors. Haemophilia. 2021 Nov; 27(6):921-931.
-
Performance of Male Condoms When Used With and Without a Silicone Placebo Vaginal Ring-A Randomized, Crossover Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 09 01; 85(1):51-57.
-
Performance and Acceptability of the FC2 Female Condom When Used With and Without a Silicone Placebo Vaginal Ring-A Randomized, Crossover Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 09 01; 85(1):58-65.
-
Functional performance study of an adapted design of the woman's condom: a crossover, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Jun; 24(3):233-239.
-
End-user preference for and choice of four vaginally delivered HIV prevention methods among young women in South Africa and Zimbabwe: the Quatro Clinical Crossover Study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 05; 22(5):e25283.
-
A Randomized Crossover Study Evaluating the Use and Acceptability of the SILCS Diaphragm Compared to Vaginal Applicators for Vaginal Gel Delivery. AIDS Behav. 2018 01; 22(1):127-132.