Header Logo

Connection

Paul Ruff to Double-Blind Method

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Paul Ruff has written about Double-Blind Method.
Connection Strength

0,320
  1. Observed benefit and safety of aflibercept in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: An age-based analysis from the randomized placebo-controlled phase III VELOUR trial. J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 01; 9(1):32-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0,136
  2. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 study of docetaxel compared to docetaxel plus zosuquidar (LY335979) in women with metastatic or locally recurrent breast cancer who have received one prior chemotherapy regimen. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Sep; 64(4):763-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0,076
  3. Aflibercept Plus FOLFIRI vs. Placebo Plus FOLFIRI in Second-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Post Hoc Analysis of Survival from the Phase III VELOUR Study Subsequent to Exclusion of Patients who had Recurrence During or Within 6 Months of Completing Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-Based Therapy. Target Oncol. 2016 06; 11(3):383-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0,031
  4. Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced acute emesis: a multicentre double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study. The Ondansetron and Granisetron Emesis Study Group. Oncology. 1994 Jan-Feb; 51(1):113-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0,027
  5. Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: prespecified subgroup analyses from the VELOUR trial. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan; 50(2):320-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0,026
  6. Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 01; 30(28):3499-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0,024
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.